ChuckHumor, action, government secrets, placed in an everyday setting.
Chuck has a little bit of everything, and it works. The characters are likable. The plot, though a bit far-fetched (but c'mon, it's TV), is intriguing. This was as fun, exciting, entertaining, humorous a new show as I've seen in quite some time. This has the potential to be the best new show of the year, in my book.
- 2 thumbs up from Stephen
I liked
Chuck because its action sequences reminded me of
Alias in its glory days and also because the title character possesses a charm and likeability reminiscent of Adam Brody's turn as Dave on
Gilmore Girls or Jim Halpert on
The Office. Stephen's right in saying that
Chuck has a bit of everything, and while sometimes that can make for a show with little cohesiveness, it works for this one. I'm looking forward to seeing how the season develops, and I hope the next episodes are as good as, or surpass, the first one.
-2 thumbs up from Erin
Back to YouThere were some humorous moments of the show. It will be well-acted with Kelsey Grammer (Frazier), Patricia Heaton (Everybody Loves Raymond), and Fred Williard. The concept and setting of it taking place on a news show setting is unique. I'm not sure how much drama they're going to try to include, but it seemed to be about half and half in the premiere. It appears to be back story driven, and I'm not sure I'm interested in that. I'm still undecided on if I'll be watching regularly. I'll give the 2nd episode a try and then decide.
- 1 thumb up from Stephen
Aside from the seemingly requisite side character who inserts raunchy oneliners into the dialogue, I didn't mind
Back to You. I have to disagree about the setting being unique;
Mary Tyler Moore also took place on a news set, as have other shows, but I do think that having Kelsey Grammer play an anchor who is returning to his first station after falling from his elite status is interesting. Heaton and Grammer have good rapport together, but I feel like the show is going to head in a rather predictable direction. While entertaining, the show probably won't be on my "must-see" list.
-1 thumb up from Erin
JourneymanThis just didn't work for me. It seemed choppy and confusing. I didn't relate to or sympathize with the main character. I'm a fan of time travel movies, books, shows, and I was hoping for something more along the lines of
Quantum Leap. In the end, I just didn't care enough about the plot or any of characters to consider watching this again in the future.
- 0 thumbs up from Stephen
I think
Journeyman is trying to revamp
Quantum Leap, but I don't think it works so well. The plot had me a bit intrigued, but I was left with too many questions by the show's end, and I don't think I have the patience to endure one more show that thrives on raising questions in the minds of the viewers while rarely answering them (see
LOST and
Heroes and, for a brief time,
The Nine). Having just taught a time-themed composition class last semester, I was curious to see how time would be dealt with in this show, but it often was hard to determine exactly what time the main character was in. Good in theory but poor in execution, Journeyman will likely not keep my interest.
-.5 thumbs up from Erin